Cams (spring-loaded camming devices) are vital in traditional (trad) climbing because they transform outward pulling force into sideways holding power, allowing climbers to safely protect parallel-sided cracks, flares, and pockets where passive gear like nuts would fail or slip out.
Basic Cam Set:
This will cover 90%+ of what you need in Washington State
Camalot C4 0.3-3.0 - double set
"Gold Standard" of cams
Can be shared between 2 climbers
Advanced Cam Set:
This is a really nice set with a blend of durability and great grippiness in small cracks
Totem Black-Purple
Camalot Z4 0.2-0.5
Camalot C4 0.75-3.0 - double set
Cam size comparison
Source: cam-parison.com
A double set of 0.3 to 3.0 cams will cover most climbs
Black Diamond Camalot C4s
BD C4 are built to be used infinitely - slings are replaceable by manufacturer
Considered the Gold Standard for cams
The first dual axle cams used for climbing was the Camalot which was released in 1987 under the Chouinard Equipment brand before it became Black Diamond in 1989
Double axle design allows C4s to be used as passive protection or if they umbrella
Manufacturer provides a Passive Strength Rating
Sandstone and loose rock can expand when a cam is stressed, which in turn can max out the cam ("unbrella")
Cams not designed for passive protection will "blow out" when they "umbrella"
Can be used as a "nut" if needed for intentional passive protection
Some C4 are now available with extendable slings
BD Ultralight Cams
20-25% lighter than C4s is significant
Limited lifespan since they use braided Dyneema cord instead of steel cables
More expensive than C4 and don't last forever
Not that much more expensive initially
Fut if you need to replace them in 5 years, they are a LOT more expensive
You'll need to decide if weight savings are worth it
Manufacturer provides a Passive Strength Rating
Metolius Ultralight Master Cam
Considered best value for your money
Single-axle design
Uses cam stops to limit motion of lobes
NOT designed for passive protection
Lightweight
Original Metolius Master Cam came out in 2008
Ultralight released in 2015 and are 40% lighter than older generations
Narrower 13.25-degree camming angle
Individual cams covers a smaller range of crack widths compared to double-axle units
Larger sizing gaps especially between blue/yellow and orange/red ranges
Range Finder Dots
Nice for new users
Hard to read in real world use
Single-stem design can occasionally twist and tip over when you "bumping" or reposition them
Larger cams (#7) may come in contact with trigger cord while under load - resulting in wire failure
Wild Country Friends
Wild Country "Friend" cam (single axle) in 1978 is the world's first mass-produced and widely popular commercial climbing cam
New dual axle design is comparable to C4
Dual-axle design similar to C4s
Double axle was introduced in 2016
Manufacturer provides a Passive Strength Rating
Same color scheme
Extendable 12mm Dyneema sling
May allow you to carry less apline slings
Can get caribiner out of deep cracks
Generally less expensive
Older generation cams need inspection
Cams date back to 1980s and 1990s
Inspect for axle corrosion, worn lobes, or retired textile lifespans
Older slings had bar tacking that would snag - should be replaced at this point
DMM Dragon Cams
Dual-axle design similar to C4s
Came out in 2010 with BD dual-axle patent expired
Manufacturer provides a Passive Strength Rating
Doesn't have thumb loop
Changes how you hold these to place them
Slightly softer metal than BD
Extendable 8mm Dyneema sling
Ligher than BD C4 since you can carry less apline draws
Can get caribiner out of deep cracks
Hot-forged lobes with corner grooves designed to enhance bite and friction on slick or softer rock like limestone
More expensive than BD C4 and about as expensive as Totem
Totem Cams
Specialty single axle cam system that will hold with 2 lobes
NOT designed for passive protection and will "Blow" if umbrella
Designed differently than Camalots and excells in special conditions
Excellent for aid climbing
More information on Totems below
Doesn't cover entire range to 3.0
Yellow (~2 for BD) is largest cam
Came out in late 2010
First batch was recalled due to color-anodized lobes potentially affecting holding power
Production shifted to microblasted lobes
Most Expensive
Some climbers add smaller cams to their set and sometimes replace their smaller C4s with Totems, Z4s or Aliens
These fit better in smaller holes and have flexier stems which are better for horizontal placement
May be needed for:
Index Town Walls
Technical granite cracks and pin scars
Thin Fingers (5.11a, Index)
Japanese Gardens (5.11d, Index)
Model Worker (5.11c, Index)
Town Crier (5.9 C2, Index Upper Wall):
Leavenworth
Select thin-crack zones such as at Icicle Creek Canyon
Quick comparisZ4s are the easiest to use and strongest of these 3
Totems can hold with just 2 lobes
Aliens are generally less expensive
Totems
These are in "Standard Totems" - NOT in "Basic Totems"
Cult Following
These were and on occasion and still are in short supply
There is a cult following for these, in part due to scarcity
They are overpriced in part because of this
They are really good, but the hype is much greater than it should be
Black Diamond Z4 are less expensive and work about as well as Totems
Z4 are NOT designed for 2 lobe use, but are easier to use and stronger
A set of each is better than 2 sets of either
Special Features of Totems:
Direct-Load Lobe Design
Patented design distributes the load equally across all four independently moving lobes
Consider better for flaired cracks
Used in uneven rock surfaces where you may wish to use an offset cam
Allows them to hold securely even when only two lobes are engaged
Use of 2 lobes for hold is great for aid climbing where you only need to hold your body wieght
2 lobes on one side may not hold a falling climber
Ultra-Narrow Head Width
Exceptional for shallow cracks, pockets, pin scars, and flared placements
Flexible Double Stem
Reduces walking (movement inside the crack once placed) and absorbs directional pull
Great for horizontal placement where flex is good
Larger sizes (like Orange/1.80) can feel slightly floppy during one-handed placement
Two-Lobe Loading Capability
Can be clipped and loaded on just two lobes (using the specific sling attachment point) for aid climbing situations
This significantly reduces overall stability
Single Axle
NOT designed for use as passive protection like the double axle Camalot
These will "blow out" if umbrella'd if sized incorrectly or if used on sandstone
Use Recommendation
Add 1-2 Black 0.5 Totems (which is smaller than BD 0.3) to BD C4 Rack
Some like the versatility of smaller Totems over C4s
If you have extra money, replace one or both smaller BD in the following order:
Blue 0.65 Totem to replace BD Blue 0.3
Yellow 0.8 Totem to replace BD Gray 0.4
Purple 1 Totem to replace BD Purple 0.5
Some prefer Totems over C4s
If you have lots of extra money:
Green 1.25 Totem to replace BD Green .75
Red 1.5 Totem to replace BD Red 1
Orange 1.8 Totem to replace Yellow 2
Black Diamond Camalot Z4s
0 to 0.75
Comparable to Totems and in smaller sizes
These don't have a cult following like Totem and Alien
There are endorsed by Alex Honnold, but he is also a long-time sponsored athlete for Black Diamond Equipment
Compared to C4
Hybrid stem stiffness
Stiff when retracted for placement - eases placement
Floppy when placed and released - reduces walking after placed
Flexible stem is better for horizontal placement than C4
Narrower head size will more easily fit in smaller pin scars
Narrower head may not work as well as C4s in splitters as the wider C4 head means wider dispersion of force
Compared to Totems
Z4s are easier to place as they are rigid during placement and flop when released
Fast to use and evaluate for trad climbing
"Larger" Z4s (0.3 and larger) with double axles are stronger since they can survive being umbrella'd (Totems will explode)
The independent-lobe design of totems are superior in marginal placements since they will hold with just 2 lobes
Better for aid climbing and for poorer quality anchor points
Compared to Aliens
Black Diamond as better quality control
Faster to place and assess
Range and cam stop strength is better in double axle sizes (.3 and up)
Not as grippy as Aliens
Alien Cams
Some climbers use Aliens for micro sizes
Black 1/3 and Blue 3/8 are smaller than Black Totems
Use for micro cracks
Less expensive than BD Z4 or Totems
Incredibly narrow head profile
Can fit into tighter holes than Totems
Soft aluminum "bites" Washington Granite
Alien cams, Totem Basic and BD Z4 use a softer 6061-T6 aluminum alloy for its lobes
Totem (standard) and BD C4 uses a harder 7075-T6 aluminum alloy
Extendable sling is nice
Similar to Totems, these have a cult following
NOTE the many issues with Alien Cams:
Softer 6061-T6 wears faster than Camalot C4s
Lobes are known to seize if you get dirt in the springs - frequent cleaning required
Flexible triggers and narrow profiles can cause these to snag on other racked gear
Alien has a long history of issues
1985 - David Waggoner invents the original Alien Cam for Colorado Custom Hardware (CCH)
2006 - CCH issues a recall for Alien Cams after reports of unit failures and structural concerns
The "Dimpled" Cam Recall - dimples on lobes due to rapid water cooling after brazing - compromised metal strength
2009 - David Waggoner passes away
2011 - Fixe Climbing (Tech Rock) from Spain acquires CCH and moves manufacturing to Barcelona
Fixe officially re-released the Fixe Alien Classic cams in September 2011
The trigger wires can bend out of shape or snap with heavy use
Users reported instances where small fasteners, bolts, or ferrules holding the cam lobes to the axle came loose or fell apart under light weighting or bounce testing
Fixe introduced the Alien Evolution climbing cam in late 2014 to replace the Alien Classic
New trigger wires were made of a thin cable composed of multiple smaller wires instead of a solid wire
Issues with woven trigger cables fraying
The trigger sleeve could detach from the collar at the trigger wire bar - making cam removal really challenging
Fixe Alien Lite (EVO Lite) used heavy plastic-nylon trigger components to cut weight by 25%
Same issues with cable fraying
Plastic trigger sleeves frequently cracked, split, or detached entirely from the collar bar
Could crack or shatter upon impact with rock.
2017 - Fixe launches the updated Alien Revolution and Alien Classic line to fix earlier mechanical weaknesses
Replaces woven cables with solid trigger wires and upgrading plastic trigger components to aluminum
Reports regarding rare machining or counterbore flaws on early runs
Reports of out-of-the-box mechanical snags where lobes failed to return smoothly to 100% open without manual assistance - generally replaced by Fixe
2023 - Fixe Climbing releases the Alien X micro cams (6th generation of the classic Alien climbing cam)
Resolved many of the historic quality-control and build issues seen in older Alien Revolution generations
Some climbers note that the newer wire trigger design can occasionally cause the cam to slightly retract or shift when weighted over an edge in a horizontal placement, potentially reducing security
Not as "bomber" as Totem or Z4
Other less popular small Small Cams
DMM Dragonfly Cam
Extendable sling setup
When the cam is expanded in a crack, this gap opens to its widest point, making it very easy for dirt, dust, and rock grit to get trapped inside the mechanism even after a single placement
Compared to competing micro-cams (BD Z4 or older C3), these offer a slightly more limited expansion range per individual size unit
Must be more accurate with size selection or risk choosing an under-cammed or over-cammed piece
Color coding same as BD, but doesn't match BD sizes - they map closer to Metolius or Alien micro-cams
Small-diameter trigger wires, cables, and lobe mechanics are inherently more delicate than larger trad gear
Metolius Ultralight Master Cam
Best bang for the buck
Light weight
The smallest sizes (such as #0 and #00) are prone to over-camming and getting stuck
Wild Country Zero Friends
Overly stiff triggers or a floppy head design that makes accurate placement difficult in non-parallel or shallow horizontal cracks
Head width can feel bulky compared to competing micro-cams (like Totems or Z4s), making them harder to slot into tight or irregular constrictions
Cams are made with different aluminums
Aluminim can be hard and durable or soft and "grippy"
Softer metal cams include
Totem
Black Diamond Camalot Z4
Alien Revolution
Zero Friends
Each company has its own color scheme for sizing
This is important if you are mixing systems or sharing cams with other climbers
Black Diamond seems to be the most popular system, and many climbers are familiar with the color system
These share the same color/size system
Black Diamond Camalot (C4, Z4 and others)
Wild Country Friends
DMM Dragon Cams and DMM Dragonfly micro cams
Totems are almost the same, except for what would match up with BD Grey .4 (Totem Yellow) and BD Yellow 2 (Totem Orange)
Metolius Ultralight Master Cams use something completely different
If matching colors is important, you can color code your carabineers or paint your cams with a paint pen